Join this Group for Updates and Discussions on this Blog (and a few others)!

Google Groups Join

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Health Insurance for the Poor - Is it the best solution??

Happen to just read an article at Healthcare as a broad public challenge Sri. Jayaprakash Narayan of Loksatta, Hyderabad is one of our people constantly reminding us about the issue of health expenditure and the implications of the same. In this article he has addressed the proposal of the Government to introduce a subsidized healthcare system for the rural poor. He says that the obvious solution may not be the best and the government needs to consider the solution from different angles.

I have had the opportunity to recently study the health expenditure of some of the poor and not so poor rural communities in a few pockets of TN, Andhra and Karnataka and I tend to agree with Jayaprakashji on this. I found it encouraging that in most of our villages still healthcare is translated as 'an overall feeling of goodness' that encompassed both physical and mental health and not merely absence of diseases. There is certainly a large awareness on hygiene practices prevalent.
However, I also was a witness to many dangerous practices creeping in rural areas in terms of modern medical quacks and irregulated drug stores. Across Tamilnadu it was common a few months back to find cases of drug stores providing over the counter medicine 'pack' containing among other things, steroid medicine for cases of Chi-gun! Similarly I learnt the the poorer patients in government hospital in Tamilnadu (though aware of its dangers) have to go through the treatment of the same needle being used to inject for 10-15 patients.
With the traditional system of healthcare almost completely uprooted in rural areas (ironically, at a time when they are resurfacing as a fad in the urban centers), the native wisdom and free herbal remedies from the kitchen gardens for even simple illnesses are slowly disappearing from the collective village minds (though I found the same can be easily revitalized through a few simple interventions NGOs have tried out). In a meeting with a group of women belonging to Self-Help Groups(SHGs) in Andhra Pradesh, with an average age of about 40, none of the women knew how to prepare a 'kashayam'!
Mutual insurance has been introduced by NGOs among such women's groups and I feel that this is a good alternative to larger subsidized insurance programmes. But, there cannot be an alternative for a thorough inspection and increase in efficiency of the PHCs, increase in the risk-pooling mechanisms and also a tough regulation on the sale and administering of drugs - both over the counter and through clinics. At the cost of sounding outdated, I think it is still not late to also encourage a kitchen garden based self-medication for at least simple illnesses that can help the poor by saving their medical expense. A dry land farmer in Ramnad mentioned that each outing to a hospital costs him Rs. 350 to 400/- and at times he has to visit the doctors twice every month. Most poor in villages spend on health only if they are pushed to it and then it costs them almost half their wage (if not more, the national average is 60%). They are dependent on their little savings and lending from local villagers and money lenders (and increasingly from SHGs). Hospitalization can mean repayment of loan for the next few decades, unless another member in the family gets a really high paying job, which means migration to either urban or abroad centers as labourer.
Private clinics abound in the rural landscape all over south India today and most villages have at least one quack. A politically well connected local leader in Kuppam in AP mentioned how it some of the quacks are directly connected to medical companies which in turn are owned by corrupt officials and politicians. And it is not just the danger of quacks, even practicing physicians in rural areas happily take advantage of the fact that people don't understand the science and are willing to blindly follow the physician. In Thiruvallur district in TN, I have been told by Panchayat leaders that there are private clinics that inject drips to anyone who comes in as they have been set target by drug companies. In one of my travels, a co-passenger in a train, who happened to be wife of a drug company marketing manager mentioned that her husband is often planning foreign trips for doctors who 'perform' well in their target achievements as a bonus!!
We need to really understand the impact of globalized healthcare system (with its aggressive marketing practices) and its cost implications on the poorest. Why are per visit costs to clinics getting costlier? Why do the number of prescribed tests for the same symptoms seem to be going up with times? are some of the critical questions. Indiscriminate prescription is another major illness that ails our medical system. A friend recently quoted Dr. Arjun Rajagopal of Sundaram Medical Foundation, Chennai as saying that,
"...we are sitting on a volcano as far as misuse of antibiotics is concerned - an epidemic far worse than AIDS"
. When I further enquired with Dr. Rajagopal, he provided another insights saying, "...the problem that you are referring to, is one symptom of a larger disease - the faulty prescribing habits and ethics of the medical profession. Change, if it is possible at all, can come only from within practicing physicians and not from attitudes of confrontation and censure from outside. This has to start early - from the days of medical college education. And this is where I run into a wall of despair. The present trends and policies with regards to the licensing and certification of medical schools and teaching hospitals has degenerated to one of a crass and unhealthy form of commercialism that does not forebode good for us all". This is another dimension that the general public is unaware of.
A subsidized hospitalization (through the proposed government insurance programme) for the poor in India will be to the human health as bad as a chemical pesticide subsidy to the crops and soil health. It will make the companies rich, the poor, poorer and the overall health worse and whatever self-reliance is there will be wiped out. And worse, it cannot guarantee a quality physician or healthy life. All this at the cost of public funds!!

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Blog on Vidharba Farmer Suicides: andolan

This morning google alerts fetched this blog that seems to keep track of the vidharba farmers suicides, a national shame!

andolan: "Tuesday, January 23, 2007
FIFTY VIDARBHA FARMERS SUICIDE IN JANUARY-2007
FIFTY VIDARBHA FARMERS SUICIDE IN JANUARY-2007 TOO-MORE DISTRESS REPORTED IN FARMING COMMUNITY"

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Racially Insensitive Joke: Hillary Clinton calls Gandhi as running a petrol station

This seems to be a season for Gandhi defamation and mismanagement...first we had the book by his grandson being scandalized all over and then the pole dancing disco video and now Hillary Clinton...at least the Senator apologised immediately. But, coming in the immediate aftermath of an Indian actor being subjected to racist remarks in British television, this is certainly not in good taste...surprisingly bad timing for an American politician!

CNN.com - Hillary Clinton 'truly regrets' Gandhi joke - Jan. 7, 2004: "Remarks called stereotypical, racially insensitive

Wednesday, January 7, 2004 Posted: 1642 GMT (12:42 AM HKT)
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks Saturday at a fund-raiser for Senate candidate Nancy Farmer, right.

ST. LOUIS, Missouri (AP) -- Sen. Hillary"Rodham Clinton apologized for joking that Mahatma Gandhi used to run a gas station in St. Louis, saying it was "a lame attempt at humor."

The New York Democrat made the remark at a fund-raiser Saturday. During an event here for Senate candidate Nancy Farmer, Clinton introduced a quote from Gandhi by saying, "He ran a gas station down in St. Louis."

After laughter from many in the crowd of at least 200 subsided, the former first lady continued, "No, Mahatma Gandhi was a great leader of the 20th century." In a nod to Farmer's underdog status against Republican Sen. Kit Bond, Clinton quoted the Indian independence leader as saying: "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

The director of a U.S. center devoted to Gandhi's teachings called the remarks stereotypical and racially insensitive, while an educator said the flap underscored the need for politicians to be cautious when trying to get laughs.

"Political speeches can't be like episodes of The Simpsons," said David Robertson, a University of Missouri-St. Louis political science professor.

After being approached by The Associated Press to clarify the remarks, Clinton suggested in a statement sent late Monday that she never meant to fuel any stereotype -- often used as a comedic punch line -- that certain ethnic groups were synonymous with operating America's gas stations.

Monday, January 22, 2007

The Racist Remark Episode: Why is our English media so....?

Staying away from my normal work location, wanted to avoid commenting on this national obsession of the last week, but, the continued media attention (like the one below, an editorial in the Hindu) and my current work made me to add my comment to the entire issue.

The Hindu : Opinion / Editorials : Of rage, ratings and reality shows: "Surely this is too much fuss over tawdry, tabloid television. The whole idea is to star people desperate for instant fame and quick money and grab eyeballs by every means possible — rudeness, bad taste, shocking conduct."

I am not surprised about the provocation that people have felt across the country on this episode, we need to agree that cinema personalities and cricketers are the most visible Indians and regardless of their career status, if they have been visible and recognized in India, they are recognized as a symbol of India outside.

The media demeans by such discussion ("much fuss", "she was paid anyway", "we are all racists", "hahaha...her career will become better now", "we are more racist", etc.) and hence fails to understand what provokes India or a sense of 'Indian-ness' in most Indians (I would leave out those who sit with these same newspapers every morning and let it dictate their opinion about the world, thankfully they are a minority). We need to understand that there is a strong identity of India still prevalent among most people in India and ordinary people do get provoked when they feel that identity has been abused or insulted.

Maybe the Biharis don't know the difference between the programme title and the person who insulted the Indian, but, them burning effigy was an expression of their anger, why should the media showoff its 'tardiness' by pointing out this? (the same editorial has the line 'angry protesters in Patna burnt effigies of someone called Big Brother') I suppose the newspaper wants to show off how much more English than Bihari it is? If only more Biharis had self-respect and sense they would burn the newspaper next!

Increasingly the ability of India to respond to and in influencing a larger region is visible and gaining in strength, and this is not through expression by editors sitting in their babel towers, but by the ordinary people in the streets. Our politicians respond and make statements because (despite their all other limitations) they are more sensitive to the feeling of the people in the streets.

I think it is a positive sign if so many people across the country have been provoked by an abuse of one Indian from a Westerner. One only wishes that such provocation be felt by bureaucrats when they sit for trade negotiations and media which shamelessly recycles what the western media spoke day before yesterday. They allow India(ns) to be abused more regularly and participate in it too. Wish they were as Indian as the Biharis!

Sunday, January 14, 2007

Further on Gandhi

Found a tool that can keep track of how frequently people chatter on Gandhi through their blogs. The following table gives how many blogs (not to mention websites, web pages, news papers, videos, etc.) talk of Gandhi...seemed impressive and thought I would share it with you all.

Posts that contain Gandhi per day for the last 30 days.
Technorati Chart
Get your own chart!

'Gandhi' - book, rock and google sets

Two recent news items within as many weeks and the nation debates on the Mahatma again.

The first is a book by his grandson, in his words, "to bring Gandhi more closer to people" or "humanize him" seems to have created only one central topic of debate - that of Gandhiji's relationship with Saraladevi. Though the author of this book has repeatedly stated, from the time the first interview appeared in the cover page of a popular weekly a few weeks back that, his intention was not to scandalize some hidden secret and thereby gain some popularity, his voice seems to have been overtaken by others' rendering of his work. News items in every corner of the globe have carried this news item in the past week or so and it seems to have been debated much in some television channels in India as well. Even the author's letter of protest regarding the way the initial magazine report was carried was published along with a mocking response from a reporter! Perhaps he didn't have a clue that humanizing of Gandhi meant to reducing him to the taste(lessness) of such persons too! I think it is wonderful to certainly 'humanize' Gandhi, to place him with his limitations and weaknesses certainly brings him down from the high pedestal in which he is often placed making him beyond the reach of the common. However, he did often say that he 'only articulated the feelings that were in the hearts of the millions who couldn't articulate them' and many writers have repeatedly pointed out that the reason he was able to reach out to millions across the country was only because he understood and articulated what the ordinary people felt. So, that makes the job of anyone wanting to 'bring him closer to people' much easier. They just need to point out those aspects of his words / work which struck a chord in people - then and perhaps even now. Just last year, 'Gandhigiri' did it, by appealing to a sense of fairplay and human kindness. These point out the commonality between the ordinary (in the case of Munnabhai, not just ordinary, a goonda at that) and the Mahatma, but, strengthen both the position of Gandhi and the ordinary in the process. Showing some icon as being weak to make him palatable to the weak doesn't seem to be such a good idea. The weak can perhaps use this to justify (and even worse consolidate) their position! Gandhi himself once while he starts to criticize Swami Vivekananda, controls himself and says, 'we should not unnecessarily criticize such great persons, we don't know what it will lead to'! Such responsible communication!

The second reason for the spate of Gandhi pop-ups seem to be an album that seems to have done the rounds in television channels and a web portal in which a rock singer of Indian origin dressed as Gandhi does pole dancing and shoots people with a toy gun. Perhaps he too was wanting to bring Gandhi 'closer to reality of current times'. There is a spate of protests and a protest from the Government of India and this evening there was even a news item that the web portal that carried the image may be banned in India! It seems ironic that the minister has stated the reason that Gandhi is almost worshiped in India as a reason for the protest to the rock album. Such blind worship is what Gandhi's grandson wants to break with his book! Would the minister ban the book by Rajmohan Gandhi on the same grounds?

It is exciting to know that the spirit of Gandhi still haunts this country. You can like him or dislike him, but, cannot ignore him in India. Some time ago a good friend informed us how though many politicians claim to not like Gandhi or his policies when challenged would not dare to say it so in a public gathering for fear of upsetting the ordinary people's sentiments. A scholar or a rock singer don't have to negotiate their position through public validated every five years. So, they can allow their own priorities and creative urges overshadow their responsibility. To be fair to both of them, I have neither read the book nor watched the video.

Something else, perhaps not too unconnected - while looking through recent additions by Google Labs, stumbled on a new program called Google Sets. This is a good tool that provides you with a set of related topics, links, etc. if you type one search topic, word or phrase. For example, typing in one known work of an author could fetch all her other works. I suppose this is fetched through some criteria based search by the web-omniscient Google search. Wanting to test the application, I typed 'Gandhi' and it fetched the following set of words as the result -

Medieval
Ancient
Freedom Struggle
Royalty
Timelines
Gibran Kahlil
Goldschneider Gary
General
Goodman Linda
Aesthetics
Epistemology
Eastern
Humanism
Good Evil
Logic
Existentialism
Early Modern
Search Engines
20th Century
19th Century
Castles
Napoleon
American Revolution

These are either key words of websites associated with Gandhi or these are titles that people who searched for Gandhi are searching for. Glad to note that the world is not looking for either 'secret love episodes in the life of famous personalities' or 'famous personalities mocked by pop stars' or anything remotely connected to that when they search for Gandhi, the media notwithstanding.

Read by Label